Emotionally Unavailable or Just Vaguely Rude?
A love story between bad communication and low expectations.
There’s a strange flex floating around lately:
“I’m low maintenance.”
“I don’t like to disturb people.”
“I don’t catch feelings, I catch flights.”
“I’m not good with all that emotional talk.”
Translation:
I will ghost you with grace.
I will not check in.
And I will confuse detachment for dignity until we both forget we’re humans, not algorithms.
Look, boundaries are good.
Independence? Lovely.
But somewhere along the way, a generation started branding emotional unavailability as a personality trait.
We started confusing aloofness for self-respect.
Avoidance for emotional intelligence.
“I don’t like drama” for “I avoid conflict because I was never taught how to sit with discomfort.”
And let’s not even talk about how many friendships and romantic possibilities are dying quiet deaths because someone “didn’t want to seem too needy.”
Here’s the truth:
You can’t build anything meaningful without vulnerability.
You can’t be close without communication.
You can’t keep saying “That’s just how I am” when how you are is emotionally absent, selectively mute, and impossible to reach past 7pm.
It’s not edgy. It’s just lonely.
We were made for connection, the awkward kind. The honest kind. The text-you-first kind. The “just checking in” kind. The “that thing you said hurt me but I still care” kind.
So here’s your gentle nudge:
You don’t have to trauma-dump on every chat.
But please, show up. Speak up. Say something real.
Being emotionally present is not a weakness. It’s a flex.
Because this year, we’re leaving behind dry texters, distant friends, and the myth that bottling everything up is cute.
Give us clarity. Give us effort. Give us healed energy with range.
Or as they say:
If you can post a reel, you can send a voice note.
This is beautiful. Thank you for this gentle reminder to do better with my relationships 🫶🏾
Life is an amalgamation of nuances and so are relationships. Human beings are also complex and dynamic and even while I give it to you for some apt pointers you raise to bettering existing relationships, I believe applying others would be at the risk of being painfully simplistic.